|
|
January 2006 |
What can be expected from SB2006? |
|
+ zoom / details |
|
Universes in Universe: How did the idea of the SB come about and who are the organizers? Low Kee Hong: The National Arts Council (NAC) [1] has long planned to set up an international Biennale here but budgets and conditions were not available. In 2004, there was a precursor, SENI [2], a festival of contemporary Southeast Asian and Asian visual art. It was organized by the NAC and the National Heritage Board (NHB) [3], and both institutions are part of the Ministry for Information, Communication, and the Arts (MICA). The Singapore Biennale 2006 is organized by the NAC in partnership with NHB. In September 2006, Singapore will play host to the annual meetings of the IMF Board of Governors and the World Bank Group under the umbrella event "Singapore 2006: Global City. World of Opportunities" [4]. This event alone is expected to draw about 16,000 delegates, observers and media. There will be a number of parallel meetings and events, for which special budgets have been made available. This creates a favorable opportunity to begin the Singapore Biennale, which will not only receive the necessary financial support, but will also profit from the worldwide attention paid to "Singapore 2006". Of course large scale events like the Biennale aim to reach out to the international audiences and register a critical endorsement but for us, the Singaporean community is also a very important audience. Contemporary art, including its reception by a broader public has only a short history with us. The Biennale aims to bring current international art practices closer to the people in Singapore and to nourish their enthusiasm for it. If the Biennale does not find the desired resonance here in this country, it will hardly be possible to continue it. |
|
|
|
|
UiU: But isn’t there a danger that the occasion that makes it possible to start the Biennale this year – the meeting of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group – will hinder this openness? During such meetings, the sites where they are held usually turn into high-security tracts and criticism is not exactly welcome. At the Singapore Biennale, will voices critical of the behavior of the world’s most powerful financial institutions be permitted? LKH: The annual meeting of the IMF and the World Bank Group will not take place until September 11-20, 2006. So it will not hinder the preview and opening of the Singapore Biennale (September 1-3) in any way. And since the Biennale will continue until November 12, a few days with increased security measures in the city should not be too disruptive. Also, the exhibition sites are outside the areas where the financial meetings are being held. The curators and organizers of the Biennale have no intention of suppressing any criticism of the IMF and the World Bank Group, although there are surely better and more effective platforms for that than an art exhibition. After all, the Biennale has its own theme that has nothing to do with the financial summit, and the works of the artists have been selected on the basis of a concrete curatorial concept. Of course art has this function to critically deal with our social structures and environments but I think today there is too much complaining, too much struggling against each other, too much mutual blaming, and too little looking for solutions. All the energy that is generated to stir up conflicts, be aggressive, point fingers at each other, could be used much more constructively in the search for solutions. That, too, is something we want to underscore the Biennale with. Links:
|
contact | masthead | newsletter | search |